Microsoft Security Essentials is having a great acceptance by users as evidenced by these facts:
535,000 computers that have reported statistics, Microsoft Security Essentials has recorded more than four million detections.
Other interesting facts are that 44% of users of Microsoft Security Essentials are already running Windows 7, followed by 33% using XP and 23% who use Windows Vista.
The lower rate of detections of MSE (16%) has been given under Windows 7 even though the operating system is mostly used by users of Microsoft's antivirus. While 52% use Windows XP and Windows Vista 32%.
A third of these computers are using Windows x64 and thank PachGuard are more resistant to malware.
That acceptance may be even greater to know to the latest test conducted by AV Comparatives, which gives the Advanced + rating in this free antivirus, outperforming the other free antivirus (Avira, Avast, AVG), situated next to payment and antivirus reputation as Norton, F-Secure and Kaspersky surpassing even the very ESET NOD 32. This comparison can be found here.
Also note that Microsoft Security Essentials has been with 2010 Norton antivirus scan only obtain the comparative brand as good or better than detection, removal and disposal of remains of malware is concerned.
Data from this comparative lack of surprise to catch as the predecessor of MSE: Windows Live OneCare and gave the surprise in the same test in May.
So Microsoft Security Essentials is a good alternative to antivirus payment. I personally use for months and have had no known problems.Microsoft Security Essentials is having a great acceptance by users as evidenced by these facts:
535,000 computers that have reported statistics, Microsoft Security Essentials has recorded more than four million detections.
Other interesting facts are that 44% of users of Microsoft Security Essentials are already running Windows 7, followed by 33% using XP and 23% who use Windows Vista.
The lower rate of detections of MSE (16%) has been given under Windows 7 even though the operating system is mostly used by users of Microsoft's antivirus. While 52% use Windows XP and Windows Vista 32%.
A third of these computers are using Windows x64 and thank PachGuard are more resistant to malware.
That acceptance may be even greater to know to the latest test conducted by AV Comparatives, which gives the Advanced + rating in this free antivirus, outperforming the other free antivirus (Avira, Avast, AVG), situated next to payment and antivirus reputation as Norton, F-Secure and Kaspersky surpassing even the very ESET NOD 32. This comparison can be found here.
Also note that Microsoft Security Essentials has been with 2010 Norton antivirus scan only obtain the comparative brand as good or better than detection, removal and disposal of remains of malware is concerned.
Data from this comparative lack of surprise to catch as the predecessor of MSE: Windows Live OneCare and gave the surprise in the same test in May.
So Microsoft Security Essentials is a good alternative to antivirus payment. I personally use for months and have had no known problems.
535,000 computers that have reported statistics, Microsoft Security Essentials has recorded more than four million detections.
Other interesting facts are that 44% of users of Microsoft Security Essentials are already running Windows 7, followed by 33% using XP and 23% who use Windows Vista.
The lower rate of detections of MSE (16%) has been given under Windows 7 even though the operating system is mostly used by users of Microsoft's antivirus. While 52% use Windows XP and Windows Vista 32%.
A third of these computers are using Windows x64 and thank PachGuard are more resistant to malware.
That acceptance may be even greater to know to the latest test conducted by AV Comparatives, which gives the Advanced + rating in this free antivirus, outperforming the other free antivirus (Avira, Avast, AVG), situated next to payment and antivirus reputation as Norton, F-Secure and Kaspersky surpassing even the very ESET NOD 32. This comparison can be found here.
Also note that Microsoft Security Essentials has been with 2010 Norton antivirus scan only obtain the comparative brand as good or better than detection, removal and disposal of remains of malware is concerned.
Data from this comparative lack of surprise to catch as the predecessor of MSE: Windows Live OneCare and gave the surprise in the same test in May.
So Microsoft Security Essentials is a good alternative to antivirus payment. I personally use for months and have had no known problems.Microsoft Security Essentials is having a great acceptance by users as evidenced by these facts:
535,000 computers that have reported statistics, Microsoft Security Essentials has recorded more than four million detections.
Other interesting facts are that 44% of users of Microsoft Security Essentials are already running Windows 7, followed by 33% using XP and 23% who use Windows Vista.
The lower rate of detections of MSE (16%) has been given under Windows 7 even though the operating system is mostly used by users of Microsoft's antivirus. While 52% use Windows XP and Windows Vista 32%.
A third of these computers are using Windows x64 and thank PachGuard are more resistant to malware.
That acceptance may be even greater to know to the latest test conducted by AV Comparatives, which gives the Advanced + rating in this free antivirus, outperforming the other free antivirus (Avira, Avast, AVG), situated next to payment and antivirus reputation as Norton, F-Secure and Kaspersky surpassing even the very ESET NOD 32. This comparison can be found here.
Also note that Microsoft Security Essentials has been with 2010 Norton antivirus scan only obtain the comparative brand as good or better than detection, removal and disposal of remains of malware is concerned.
Data from this comparative lack of surprise to catch as the predecessor of MSE: Windows Live OneCare and gave the surprise in the same test in May.
So Microsoft Security Essentials is a good alternative to antivirus payment. I personally use for months and have had no known problems.